the second quarter of 1870, which was long enough to require a second judge to be brought
in to cope with it!
'Although
the list of cases is a long one,
it is satisfactory to notice that there
are
no charges of Homicide, and but few
of the more aggravated descriptions of
crime, and in this respect the present
calendar contrasts favourably with the last.
with a cricket stump by one young man upon another in the course of an altercation on the Race Course.
The Calendar, Gentlemen, may be classified as follows :-
Obtaining money under false pretences 1
Wounding 4
Forgery 3
Escape 4
Indecent assaults upon women and children 5
Housebreaking and larceny, and other similar offences 35
[Total] 50'
Daily Gleaner, July 29, 1870 ![]() There is a list of other later robberies, but none are noted as referred to the Circuit Court. Daily Gleaner, ![]() . . . . ![]() | Daily Gleaner, August 18, 1870 ![]() And that, unfortunately, seemed to be that: but in the following year another item from the courts seemed to suggest that 'James Abrahams' was aka John Turney, an old lag, with a long record. It is not entirely clear that this was so - but what was the actual explanation? Daily Gleaner, April 20, 1871 ![]() |




